1.0UNIPIhttps://www-test.unipi.it/en/Francesco Melighettihttps://www-test.unipi.it/en/author/f-melighetti/Disciplinary Board ~ UNIPIrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="56EtXMpKRl"><a href="https://www-test.unipi.it/en/about-us/academic-bodies/disciplinary-board/">Disciplinary Board</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www-test.unipi.it/en/about-us/academic-bodies/disciplinary-board/embed/#?secret=56EtXMpKRl" width="600" height="338" title="“Disciplinary Board” — UNIPI" data-secret="56EtXMpKRl" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www-test.unipi.it/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
The Disciplinary Board is responsible for conducting the investigation phase of disciplinary proceedings against university lecturers and researchers. It respects the adversarial process and guarantees the right of defence. It operates on the principle of judgement by peers. At the end of the preliminary investigation, which is initiated by the Rector, the Disciplinary Board issues […]